Storage decides your VAT. Your customer decides your EPR.

✓ Last verified against primary sources:

Two rows showing what each rule follows. The VAT row: stock moves into a warehouse in a country, and that alone creates a VAT registration in that country. The EPR row: stock moving between your own warehouses supplies nobody and creates nothing, while a sale to a customer in a country creates the packaging EPR registration in that customer's country.

There are two rules here, and almost every guide treats them as one.

Storing stock in a country makes you register for VAT there. That is true. It is why a Pan-EU seller ends up holding half a dozen VAT numbers.

Packaging EPR does not work that way. It follows your customer. You register where you supply the person who buys from you — not where the box happened to sit on the way.

One caveat straight away, because it matters more than the rule does. On Pan-EU you usually sell into your storage countries anyway. So the answer often comes out the same. What changes is the reason — and the reason is the only thing that helps when you are deciding what you can drop.

Where the “you owe EPR where you store” line came from

It is the VAT rule, one heading too high.

Someone wrote a guide covering both taxes. The sentence about storage drifted up into the EPR section. Everyone copied it. It is now quoted as fact on pages selling EPR registrations — including pages that will happily quote you per warehouse country.

The VAT half is real. Hold stock in a Member State and your sales count as happening from there. That country wants its own VAT return, and the One Stop Shop does not cover it. Hence the stack of registrations.

The EPR half was never true.

What actually puts you on an EPR register

The PPWR says you register in each country where you make packaging available for the first time. “Making available” means supplying it to somebody — in the course of business, whether or not you charge for it.

That word supplying is doing all the work.

Moving your own stock from your warehouse to your other warehouse supplies nobody. Nothing changes hands. So it is not making available, and it does not put you on that country’s register.

Selling to a customer there does.

One thing to flag, because it changes the answer for some sellers. Selling to a distributor in another country who resells your goods on usually does not make you the producer there — across a border, the obligation only lands on you if you supply end users directly. Sell parcels to consumers and you register everywhere. Ship pallets to resellers and you may register almost nowhere.

That deserves its own piece, and it is coming.

Does national law say something different?

Fair question, because the register you actually sign up to is a national one.

Germany is the one worth checking, since it has the oldest and strictest regime. The German packaging law defines placing on the market as delivery to third parties — the same test. Holding stock is not delivery. So German law lands in the same place as the EU regulation.

We have not walked through all twenty-seven. If you find a national register that says otherwise, we would like to know.

Why this usually doesn’t change your answer

Here is the part the correction can’t be published without.

Amazon ships across borders. A customer in Poland can buy your German listing and have it delivered. That is a sale into Poland, and it counts — with or without a Polish warehouse, with or without a Polish listing.

So most Pan-EU sellers do owe the storage countries. They were just told the wrong reason.

Where the two genuinely come apart:

  • EFN, where you hold stock in one country and serve others from it
  • The CEE programme, where Amazon places stock in countries you may barely sell into
  • Stock parked somewhere you have no customers at all — rare, but it happens after a programme change

If you are in one of those, the distinction is worth real money. If you are on straightforward Pan-EU, it is worth knowing and not much more.

Two things that catch people out

Storing there still ends up needing a number — for a different reason. This is the part that surprises people, and it is the opposite of “Amazon is being commercial about it”.

A fulfilment provider has its own legal duty. Germany’s regulator puts it bluntly: fulfilment providers must verify that the party they work for is registered and participating in a system, and if it is not, “the fulfiller must not work for them.” The PPWR does the same across the EU — a fulfilment provider that cannot verify your registration has to suspend its service.

So Amazon holding your stock in a country is not what makes you the producer there. But it does make Amazon unable to lawfully handle your goods unless you are registered. The practical answer in a storage country is usually still “register” — just never for the reason the folklore gives.

A prep centre can create an obligation that isn’t yours. If a logistics company receives your imported goods, unpacks them and repacks them before they go out, that company is the producer for the transport packaging it handles. The regulation is explicit that this holds even though the logistics company does not own the goods. So there is an obligation in that country. It sits with them, not with you.

The clearest case in the text is goods arriving from outside the EU. Whether it reads the same way for a prep centre handling stock that is already inside the EU is less settled, and we would rather say so than guess.

One footnote with a date on it. The VAT half of the folklore is also due to change: under Council Directive (EU) 2025/516, agreed in March 2025, movements of your own stock between Member States move to an extended One Stop Shop from 1 July 2028, replacing the registration in each warehouse country. The tax does not change; the pile of registrations does. So the sentence everyone is copying is on its way to being wrong twice over.

So what do you actually do

Write two lists.

Countries where customers buy from you. That is your EPR list.

Countries where your stock sits. That is your VAT list.

On Pan-EU they will look almost identical, which is exactly why nobody notices they are different lists. It stops being academic the moment you want to cut something — leave a market and the EPR obligation goes with it, but the stock sitting there keeps the VAT registration alive. Move stock out and the reverse happens.

One thing to add to the EPR list while you are writing it. In each of those countries where you have no company of your own, the registration is only half of it — you also need an authorised representative there, and that is the part with a price on it.

The bill you get is not for where your goods have been. It is for where you sold them.

Sources

Primary sources only. Vendor pages are not cited as authority.

About the author

Jarmo Habakuk works full-time as an Amazon EU specialist. eComComply covers the compliance problems we run into ourselves while managing real listings across EU marketplaces — written up as we work through them, not researched from a distance. More about the author.

This article is general guidance, not legal advice. Compliance rules change; check the verification date above and confirm anything business-critical against the primary sources listed.